Custom engagement

When the package no longer fits, the next step is a named engagement.

Slatelock productized retainers are flat for a reason — the envelope keeps the monthly fee honest. When a brief stops fitting the envelope, the cleanest move is a custom engagement: same flat-billing discipline, sized to the brief, no hourly meter, no upsell pressure. This page reads out loud what that move looks like.

The tiers at /pricing are the entry point; this page documents the move beyond them — not a hard pitch, a map of the door.

Who this is for

Four signals that the brief no longer fits the package.

Nothing here is hidden — the package has a fixed envelope on purpose, and the brief drifts at the edges. These are the four patterns Slatelock treats as a named engagement rather than a wider tier.

Multi-location

Running ads or content for more than one location.

A regional franchise, a multi-city service business, a buyer with a footprint that no longer reads as a single market. The envelope assumes one location, one audience, one cadence — the moment the brief has more than one, the package is no longer the right frame.

In-house marketing team

There is an in-house marketing team that needs a delivery partner, not another strategist.

A team already owns the strategy and the calendar. They need a named operator to ship the artifact against the brief — landing pages, ads, copy, theme work — without pulling the team off the higher-leverage work.

Launch campaign

A launch, a rebrand, or a one-time campaign with a real close-out date.

A product launch, a rebrand going live on a fixed date, a seasonal push the calendar is built around. The work has a finish line, not a renewal. The productized tiers are designed for monthly artifact cadence — a launch wants scoped work with a hard close.

~$3k+/mo spend

Ad spend is already at roughly three thousand a month or above.

Once media is passing through at that volume, the marginal value of another productized tier is the wrong axis. The right move is a custom engagement sized against the brief — the spend is the input, the artifact is the output, the fee covers the operator.

If none of the four landed on you, the right move is the package — re-read /pricing and the tiers it stocks. The custom engagement is the documented next step, not the first step.

What changes, what does not

Scope by deliverable, instead of fixed monthly packages.

The productized tiers are flat because the artifact is fixed. A custom engagement is flat because the brief is fixed. The fee, the cancellation, the reporting cadence — all are answered up front, on the same terms the productized tiers run on. The shape changes. The billing discipline does not.

What changes when the brief outgrows the envelope

  • A scope doc written against the brief — not a flat envelope against a fixed artifact
  • Custom deliverables (length, count, cadence, channel) — sized to the inputs
  • A named engagement with a buyer + operator on the record, instead of a tier
  • A single point of contact — one operator carrying the engagement end to end
  • A weekly report per engagement, instead of one report per productized tier
  • Ad spend, content tools, and engineering passes billed at cost, all on one invoice

What stays the same

  • No surprise hourly billing — the fee is set on the brief, against the artifacts
  • No theatrical reviews, no strategy decks, no "let us check in later"
  • No upsell pressure — the next conversation is about the engagement, not a higher tier
  • No retainer lock-in — quarterly cadences, billed against the artifacts, cancelled by the buyer
  • No SaaS dashboard, no monthly ping theatre — the artifact is the contract
  • No new tooling on the buyer side — the buyer stays on whatever they already run

Same flat-billing discipline, same weekly report cadence, same one-page register — just sized to the inputs.

What graduation looks like

One discovery call. A one-page statement of work.

The graduation is the moment the package stops being the right frame and a custom engagement starts being the right answer. It runs on a single SoW — the artifact, the cadence, the fee, the cancellation terms — sized against the brief, scoped from the first call.

Sample statement of work — one page

Draft
EngagementMulti-locale SEO rewrite
BuyerRegional franchise, 12 markets
Artifacts48 pages, 12 location hubs
Cadence8 weeks, weekly report
Ad spend handlingNot in scope
Fee$9,400, billed on kickoff
CancellationPre-artifact, full refund

01

One discovery call.

A 30-minute read on the brief, the inputs, and the close-out date. No deck, no scoping document, no "let us put a proposal together." The outcome of the call is either a yes, a no, or a pointer back to the productized tier.

02

One standalone statement of work.

A one-page SoW: the artifact, the cadence, the fee, the cancellation terms. The brief, not the relationship, is the scope. The same flat-billing discipline the /pricing tiers run on — without the tier envelope.

03

One close-out date.

A custom engagement is sized against a brief with a clear finish line. When the artifacts ship, the engagement closes. The buyer keeps the files on the close-out date — no hand-off period, no "let us keep going."

FAQ

The questions buyers ask before sending a brief.

Scoping, discovery, the SoW, the close-out date. Six quick answers in the same shape as the rest of the site's FAQs.

Send a brief, get a reply

Slatelock opens one custom engagement at a time. Send the brief.

The intake is the brief itself — what shipped this month, and which of the four signals on this page applies. Same-week reply: a yes, a no, or a pointer back to the productized tier that fits.

Questions? Email slatelock@polsia.app. Slatelock is productized marketing retainers with a clear deliverable, every month. built for small businesses who can't justify a $3,000-plus agency engagement.